VHP demands government ordinance on Ram Mandir construction before Dec 6th – SNS

Saints during a VHP meeting in New Delhi on Oct 5, 2018.

The Statesman Kolkata“This is the final battle for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya. The government should bring an ordinance for the construction of the temple and this should be done by the end of this year,” – VHP President Alok Kumar

Upping the ante for the construction of a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, the VHP on Friday said it was fighting a “final battle” and set a “deadline” for the BJP-led central government to bring an ordinance for it in Parliament by the end of the year.

Mounting pressure on the Centre, the VHP demanded immediate passage of a legislation in Parliament for construction of a grand Ram temple in Ayodhya, saying it cannot wait indefinitely for the judicial verdict.

The demand was made at a day-long meeting of sants which discussed the issue in the wake of the Supreme Court decision to begin hearings on the original title suit later this month and the strategy to be adopted for hastening the process of temple construction.

After the meeting, the seers also met President Ram Nath Kovind and submitted a copy of the resolution to him, while requesting him to ask the government to fulfil their demand.

“A delegation of sants met President Ram Nath Kovind and apprised him of the feelings of millions of Ram devotees, sadhu-sant and dharmacharyas and urged him to make a law for a grand Ram temple at Ram Janmabhoomi soon,” said a resolution passed by a committee of the sants.

In the meeting, Swami Vasudevanand, one of the campaigners for the temple, urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to convene a joint session of Parliament to pass the legislation.

“We urged the President in a memorandum that he write to the Central Government asking it to bring legislation for the construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya,” one of the sants told a press conference after meeting the President in the presence of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) Working President Alok Kumar.

Addressing a press conference, VHP’s international working president Alok Kumar set the “deadline” for the government to bring the ordinance in Parliament by the year-end.

“This is the final battle for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya. The government should bring an ordinance for the construction of the temple and this should be done by the end of this year,” Kumar said.

Describing the Narendra Modi government as one of “Ram bhakts”, the VHP leader expressed the hope that it would acknowledge the feelings of crores of Hindus in the country and bring the law “before the sunset of 2018”.

“If that does not happen, then all the options are open before us. The future course of action will be decided during the two-day ‘Dharam Sansad’ to be held next year on the sidelines of the Maha Kumbh in Allahabad,” Kumar said.

He categorically said that only a temple would be built at the site in Ayodhya, while informing that the “Dharam Sansad” would be held on January 31-February 1, 2019 and all the prominent seers from across the country would take part in it.

Without naming Congress president Rahul Gandhi, Kumar said the janeudhari leader (one wearing the Hindu sacred thread), who had recently started visiting temples, should also support their demand.

He also mentioned that in 1989, the BJP had passed a resolution at its national meeting in Palampur for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya.

When it was pointed out that the matter was still sub-judice in the Supreme Court, Kumar said it was unlikely that the verdict would be pronounced anytime soon.

“I think the Supreme Court neglected its duty. We have waited for long, now we cannot wait,” he said.

Sharing the VHP’s plans for the coming days, Kumar said huge public meetings would be organised in all the parliamentary constituencies across the country, demanding an early construction of the temple.

Delegations will meet their respective MPs and raise the demand for the construction of the temple in Ayodhya, he added. – The Statesman, ^ October 2018

Carving stones for the Ram Temple at Ayodhya

See also


 

Advertisements

5 Responses

  1. Pravin Togadia

    Pravin Togadia hits out at PM Narendra Modi, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on Ram Temple issue – PTI / Financial Express – Nagpur – Oct 7, 2018

    Former Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Pravin Togadia on Sunday hit out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat accusing them of not fulfilling the promise of building Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

    Togadia also slammed Bhagwat for stating that “Hindu Rashtra does not mean there is no place for Muslims”.

    Bhagwat had made the statement at the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s three-day lecture series in September this year.

    “Hindu Rashtra doesn’t mean there’s no place for Muslims. The day it is said so, it won’t be Hindutva any more. Hindutva talks about Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,” Bhagwat had said.

    Addressing a press conference here Sunday, Togadia said, “I want to ask if there is no Hindutva without gau hatyaare (cow killers), love jihadis, stone pelters and Pakistani flag wavers in Kashmir.”

    “We had joined the RSS 52 years ago considering it to be a Hindu organisation. But now we feel it is only concerned with the interests of Muslim community,” Togadia added.

    The former VHP leader alleged that the RSS was not interested in pursuing the cause of building a Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

    He said that instead of demanding a temple be constructed, the RSS chief should “order” Prime Minister Narendra Modi to get the government to enact a law in Parliament to pave the way for a Ram Temple.

    He also accused PM Modi of “appeasing” Muslim community and going back on the promise to build a Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

    “When it comes to the SC/ST Act, Modi says Parliament will decide on the matter and not the courts. But when it comes to building the Ram Temple, Modi backtracks and says the courts will decide on the issue and not Parliament,” Togadia said.

    He charged Modi with forsaking the ideology of the BJP as well as that of Hindutva.

    Speaking about the Antarrashtriya Hindu Parishad (AHP), an outfit he formed after quitting the VHP, Togadia said the organisation would pursue “Hindu politics”.

    When asked whether AHP will support the Shiv Sena in the elections, Togadia said, “If (Sena chief) Uddhav Thackeray pursues the saffron flag (Hindutva politics), we will support him.”

    Togadia had quit the VHP on April 14 this year after former Himachal Pradesh governor V. S. Kokje defeated his nominee Raghav Reddy in an election for the post of VHP International president.

  2. Note that the Babri Masjid demolished by kar sevaks in 1992 was not named after Emperor Babar.

    The masjid was named after Mir Baqi’s favourite catamite, Babri, an Afghan dancing boy—bacha baz—he was very fond of and attached to.

  3. Quote from article above: “When it was pointed out that the matter was still sub-judice in the Supreme Court, Kumar said it was unlikely that the verdict would be pronounced anytime soon.”

    There is no “sub-judice” rule in India because India does not have trials by jury.

    So don’t be fooled. Wherever a politician—or anybody else for that matter—claims something is sub-judice in a court, they are simply avoiding the issue or buying time before voicing an opinion.

Comments are moderated

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: