Jallikattu: Arguments in favour of the ‘sport’ are untenable – Radha Rajan

Jallikattu Bull

Radha Rajan is the editor of Vigil OnlineThe BJP and its supporters, who sparked and sustained the pro-Jallikattu protests, do not seem to take the very real dangers associated with the ‘sport’ seriously. – Radha Rajan

Blame for sowing the first seeds of the Occupy Marina protests in favour of Jallikattu must be laid squarely at the doors of three senior leaders of the Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party. But the crowning glory of nullifying the visionary May 7, 2014 Supreme Court order banning Jallikattu—reducing to dust 40 years of effort to petition the legislature to ban all sports using bulls as objects of entertainment and hammering the last nail in the coffin of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, 1960 by rushing through an amendment to facilitate Jallikattu—rightfully belongs to the BJP government at the Centre. Given that 10 people, including a policeman on duty, have died, that several bulls have been injured while one terrified bull running for its life died after falling into a quarry following the resumption of Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, that two bulls died during Jallikattu in Andhra Pradesh, and that hundreds of spectators have been injured, questions are now being raised about why well-known people like Sri Sri Ravishankar, Jaggi Vasudev, BJP MP Subramanian Swamy and journalist S. Gurumurthy are vocal in their support for this blood-sport.

Political observers understood the significance of students entering the fray in favour of Jallikattu, which overnight became an issue of “Tamil pride”. Even if on day one the campaign could be projected as a revolutionary student movement for Jallikattu, by day two it was no longer about the “sport” but about Tamil identity politics.

BJP leaders in the state said that if the people of Tamil Nadu chose to disregard the May 2014 Supreme Court order banning Jallikattu, the party would stand firmly with the people; one of them even let loose the bulls on his farm in what he proclaimed was a traditional bull-run. Not to be left behind, and taking their cue from the ruling party at the Centre, the two major Dravidian political parties and several Tamil-chauvinist political groups jumped into the fray, also extending support to people if they chose to defy the Supreme Court order. What the BJP should have foreseen but did not, or what the BJP saw but did not comprehend, was that within 48 hours of the Occupy Marina campaign, the mass mobilisation allegedly for Jallikattu became a massive show of strength to bring the state and central government to their knees; it succeeded even beyond their wildest expectations. The BJP government in Delhi and the state unit of the “party with a difference” came to their senses when posters of Prabhakaran of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and posters with secessionist slogans—besides slogans and posters against Modi—began to be openly flaunted on Marina beach.

It was too late by then for any political party to disown the movement without burning their fingers. Neither the central government nor the state government, much less the state unit of the BJP, were in any position to douse the fire they had lit with such cynical disdain for the law and rule of law.

When the president of India, on advice from the BJP central government, gave his assent to the Tamil Nadu amendment to the PCA Act, he was only defusing an out of control crisis threatening to explode on the people of Tamil Nadu. But the question is, at what cost? The Modi sarkar, by advising the president to give assent to the amendment, has further weakened an already weak law—the only law in this country to protect animals from human depredation.

The end result of Occupy Marina

In the wake of Sasikala’s conviction by the Supreme Court, Subramanian Swamy has been exulting in the judgment pronounced by Justices Pinaki Chandra Ghosh and Amitava Roy. On one channel, he observed with satisfaction that the order proved that not all judges are corrupt. He added that the February 14, 2017 judgment was brilliantly articulated and would henceforth be considered a landmark judgment against corruption in public life. The irony of it! Swamy and friends are oblivious or impervious to the fact that by expressing public support for Jallikattu and lobbying for it with the central government, they demolished another brilliantly and sensitively articulated judgment delivered by the same Justice Ghosh with Justice K. S. Radhakrishnan on May 7, 2014.

When the true face of Occupy Marina could no longer be kept under wraps or swept under the carpet, the state government and BJP central government adopted the carrot and stick method to end it: the state government tasked the police to vacate the occupiers of the beach in readiness for Republic Day while the BJP central government used the office of the president to facilitate what the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary describes as “An Act to amend the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 so as to preserve the cultural heritage of the State of Tamil Nadu and to ensure the survival and well-being of the native breeds of bulls.”

The Tamil Nadu amendment to the PCA says:

28-A. Saving in respect of ‘Jallikattu’—Nothing contained in this Act shall apply to ‘Jallikattu’ conducted to follow and promote tradition and culture and such conduct of ‘Jallikattu’ shall not be an offence under this Act.

  1. (1) The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Ordinance, 2017 is hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the principal Act, as amended by the said Ordinance, shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the principal Act, as amended by this Act.

This is precisely what politicians and spiritual gurus have said in support of Jallikattu, citing examples which insult our intelligence.

Untenable arguments in support of Jallikattu

Argument #1: Jallikattu is Tamil pride, Tamil culture and the cultural heritage of the state of Tamil Nadu

Not long ago (and practiced even now in certain parts of Tamil Nadu), widows had to shave their heads, give up coloured clothes, not participate in celebratory functions and rituals, and live the rest of their lives in seclusion. Girl children were married before puberty, before they could understand the institution of marriage and motherhood, and before their bodies were ready for childbearing. Women were forced to commit sati, pay dowry and submit to being “inspected” by the potential groom and his family. Not long ago, we did many things, good, bad and ugly. The bad and ugly have been given up altogether or are dying a slow death. Jallikattu, which traumatises animals and kills and maims both animals and humans, even if it is culture, tradition and heritage, must be given up like we gave up child marriage, sati and perpetual widowhood.

Argument #2: To ensure the survival and well-being of native breeds of bulls

Bulls running away in terror and jumping into wells and quarries, being knocked to death by speeding trains or fracturing their limbs is hardly well-being, much less survival. Let us return to spiritual leaders Sri Sri Ravishankar and Jaggi Vasudev, and to Swamy and journalist Gurumurthy. These four individuals have their own spheres of influence in society and may possibly have some influence with the BJP central government. They all know that not just Tamil Nadu but all of India is rich in native breeds of cattle. They also know that native cattle breeds differ from one another in various ways. If we accept the argument that Jallikattu is the only way to ensure the well-being and survival of native breeds of cattle, then what is the fate of those native breeds which are unfit for Jallikattu? And significantly, how will the BJP central government ensure the survival of native breeds in north India, where there is no Jallikattu at all? In Punjab, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal, there is no tradition of Jallikattu or anything even remotely resembling it.

There are some individuals, Jallikattu supporters, who run animal farms exclusively for Kangeyam bulls. Ravishankar also has several well-kept native breed cattle in his ashram. His Art of Living Foundation and Vasudev’s Isha Foundation must now invest in setting up similar animal farms across Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka to encourage the survival of Bargur, Umblachery, Pulikulam and Alambadi breeds of native cattle, at least two farms for every breed. If Swamy would see the wisdom of persuading his fans spread across the country and outside to come to India and invest in animal farms to breed and protect native breeds, if journalist Gurumurthy could invest time to write consistently and persistently about the need to set up animal farms and his influence with Hindu spiritual leaders, there would be no need for the Jallikattu fig-leaf argument to ensure their survival.

In the north we have the Red Sindhi, Gir, Tharparkar, Hariana and Sahiwal to name just five native breeds. How are spiritual leaders and the BJP government in the Centre going to ensure their well-being and survival, considering there is no Jallikattu in the north of India except for buffalo fights in Assam?

I will conclude by dealing with two examples cited by Swamy and Jaggi Vasudev for why Jallikattu should not be banned. Swamy has been saying—and he smiled when he said it—that people die and are maimed for life or injured in road accidents and by speeding vehicles. Even Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi said the same thing in the Supreme Court. If we do not ban vehicles, why ban Jallikattu? When people die in road, rail, water and airplane accident, reckless driving and human negligence is punished by our courts and victims get compensation. Can Swamy and friends dismiss just as lightly the death of a policeman on duty who was killed by a bull fleeing in fear and terror? And how is the bull that is maimed or killed during Jallikattu to be compensated?

Vasudev cited the example of cricket. The spiritual leader is supposed to have remarked that players are often injured and sometimes even killed when playing cricket. But we do not ban cricket. Not just cricket, players are killed or are injured in any contact sport—football, soccer or boxing. The critical difference being, these are humans who know what they are doing and also know the risks involved in the sport. They nevertheless choose to do what they are doing. Bulls do not choose. Animals are not obliged to uphold human culture, tradition or heritage. Bulls do not choose to be terrorised and abused.

Activists and spiritual leaders should use their influence and resources to look for more sensible and compassionate ways to protect native breeds of cattle, and educate society to give up practices which are not just contretemps but cruel and discriminatory. – The Wire, 17 February 2017

» Radha Rajan is a Chennai-based animal rights activist.

Article 51-A (g) of the Indian Constitution.

 

 

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. “New law did little, Jallikattu remains cruel to animals and humans” – Samhati Mahapatra – The Times of India – TNN – Feb 22, 2017

    In an interview to TOI, Peta India‘s CEO Poorva Joshipura says the new Tamil Nadu jallikattu law is incapable of doing away with the inherent cruelty in the bull sport.

    Was there any change in the way jallikattu was held in the state after the ordinance was passed?

    The fact that many people and bulls were killed and injured during jallikattu events across the state this year proved that no law is going to change the fact that the sport is inherently cruel.

    For six years until the SC’s ban on jallikattu in 2014, 43 people had died, 5,000 were injured and numerous bulls were killed in jallikattu events across the state. This time too we witnessed exactly the same thing. The men continued to pounce on the bull the same way, breaking and twisting its tail and the bull appeared to display the same degree of terror when tortured in the arena. Nothing has changed.

    Two bull tamers died and hundreds were injured at an event at Rapoosal village in Pudukottai district. Were rules mentioned in the ordinance to protect bulls adhered to in these events?

    Rules are insufficient either to protect people or bulls. At the end of the day both are hurt. Rules mentioned in the ordinance were nothing new. Similar rules were mentioned in the Tamil Nadu Jallikattu Regulation Act, 2009 (until it was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2014), but were never followed.

    Did PETA workers monitor the bull sport in districts where it was held? What are the things that went wrong?

    You need not monitor the sport to gauge the level of violence it induces. Switch on any news channel and you can see it for yourself. Bulls are not predators. They are animals of prey. They have a natural nervousness, which is for survival purposes. In jallikattu, humans exploit this natural nervousness. If you watch the bull being brought out of its enclosure, you will find that it doesn’t want to come out to the arena. It is this fear that makes it slam into things and break bones. The whole premise of jallikattu is to frighten the bull.

  2. Hundreds injured, spectator, bull killed in Jallikattu – Special Correspondent – The Hindu – Tamil Nadu – 20 February 2017

    Hundreds injured in events held across districts; case registered for holding the sport without police permission

    A youth was killed and six others suffered injuries at a jallikattu on Sunday which was held without permission at Koodamalai village near Gangavalli in Salem district on Sunday.

    The villagers had submitted a petition to the revenue authorities and police for conducting the event. Since Koodamalai was not in the list of recognised centres, police and revenue officials had refused them permission.

    However, locals organised the event on a 60-foot road and Perumal Temple Street area in the village. A large number of bulls from the nearby areas were let out through the ‘vaadivaasal’. One of the bulls strayed into the spectator area. Manikandan (17) of Koodamalai and a few others suffered injuries as it waded through the crowd.

    He was rushed to the Primary Health Centre, Gangavalli, where he was declared brought dead. Four others were admitted to the Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College Hospital.

    The Gangavalli police have registered a case and are investigating. Revenue officials visited the village and conducted an inquiry.

    In Theni, a five-year-old bull died and over 80 participants, including spectators and bull tamers, sustained injuries in jallikattu held in Theni and Dindigul districts.

    The bull brought in from Vadapalanji in Madurai district rammed a trailer parked at the exit point. It died of internal bleeding. Eyewitnesses said the bull had been racing at a breakneck speed to avoid the tamers.

    As many as 36 participants were injured, of whom five sustained grievous injuries. The seriously injured ones were referred to the Theni Government Medical College Hospital, while the others were treated at a special medical camp near the venue.

    Elaborate arrangements were put in place at the venue for the conduct of the sport. Collector N. Venkatachalam inspected the arrangements and inaugurated the event. Adequate security personnel were deployed to regulate the crowd.

    A total of 403 registered bulls from Theni and nearby districts and 274 tamers took part in the event.

    In Dindugul, as many as 21 people, including 8 tamers, 10 spectators, two bull owners and a private security guard, were injured in the event held at A. Vellode.

    Those with grievous injuries were referred to the Dindigul Government Hospital. Of the 320 registered tamers, only 290 were allowed to participate in the event. Many tamers were not allowed to take part as they had arrived in an inebriated condition.

Comments are moderated

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: