Demonetisation poorly planned: Subramanian Swamy – Tushar Dhara

Subramanian Swamy

Tushar DharaThere is a severe shortage of 100 rupee notes. Cash is drying up fast at ATMs, which are witnessing unprecedented queues, while serpentine queues outside bank branches mean that a lot of people are coming away disappointed. – Tushar Dhara

BJP MP Subramanian Swamy has lashed out at the government’s poor planning and execution of the demonetisation drive and the subsequent currency chaos that has engulfed India.

Swamy, also a member of BJP’s national executive, told the South China Morning Post daily that he was “appalled by the lack of preparation” in this regard by Finance Ministry.

“It is easy to argue that the ministry was not in the loop, but that is no excuse for not having a contingency plan,” he was quoted by SCMP.

“Ad hoc roadside kiosks should have been set up for all and special kiosks organised for senior citizens. All these should have been planned as part of a contingency plan,” Swamy said in Hong Kong, where he will give a talk on the anti-corruption efforts in India at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Saturday said in a press briefing that ATMs had not been recalibrated and that it would take up to 3 weeks for all the 2 lakh teller machines in India to start dispensing the new currency notes.

Jaitley estimated that it would take 21 days to recalibrate all the 2 lakh ATMs in the country so that they are able to dispense the new bank notes.

That was little consolation for people queuing up outside banks and ATMs on Sunday amid heavy crowds and serpentine queues. A bank holiday on Monday in some parts of the country has added to the desperation of people who are running out of lower denomination notes for meeting day to day expenses. People lining up outside ATMs on Saturday night and Sunday morning have not been able to withdraw money because the ATMs are shut or have run out of cash.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi today asked Indians to put up with the inconvenience of demonetization for 50 days, or until December 30, in a speech in Goa.

The Prime Minister in a televised announcement on November 8 said that 500 and 1,000 rupee notes would cease to be legal tender from midnight that night. He also said that ATMs would be shut for the next 2 days and would start working on November 11.

But 3 days later, there is a severe shortage of 100 rupee notes (which are still legal tender). Cash is drying up fast at ATMs, which are witnessing unprecedented queues, while serpentine queues outside bank branches mean that a lot of people are coming away disappointed.

A cap of Rs. 4,000 has been imposed on withdrawals from bank branches while ATM withdrawals ave been limited to Rs. 2,000 per card per day till November 18, after which it will be raised to Rs. 4,000. – News 18, 13 November 2016

Arun Jaitley & Arundhati BhatacharyaSubramanian Swamy blames Arun Jaitley for inconvenience of people – FE Online

BJP MP Subramanian Swamy blames Finance Ministry for the inconvenience of people due to demonetisation and said that the step alone will not end black money. He called a need of overall “package” considering several measures to combat black money and said that to Prime Minister Narendra Modi about it in a letter, ToI quoted Swamy as saying.

Since the ban on the old currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000, the step has been criticised by various sections of the society. From various political leaders to common men, many people are blaming the Centre for the inconvenience faced due to demonetisation. In the middle of the hullabaloo, Swamy blamed Union Minister Arun Jaitley for “lack of preparedness” for the step. Taking note of the difficulties faced by the people, he said that the government should make arrangements of temporary counters for exchanging currencies, especially for senior citizens.

The Rajya Sabha member said that he cannot say how the step will work because “the Indians are very intelligent and there are already discounting processes on”.

He also did not support the statement of Jaitley where he said the currency ban will lead to cheaper elections and said it will only “make fighting elections more difficult”.

In a major shock to the nation, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced the ban on high-value currency notes on November 8 midnight. Soon after the move, an uproar had been generated in the nation with people commenting on the impact and consequences of the step. – The Financial Express, 14 November 2016

»Tushar Dhara is a former general and financial journalist who escaped from the mainstream press to live and work in rural Rajasthan with the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan on issues of access to information and minimum wages and teach at the School for Democracy.

New Rupee Notes

One Response

  1. Line to change bank notes in front of the SBI New Delhi

    Note Ban: Centre didn’t plan properly – Pradeep S. Mehta & Amol Kulkarni – Deccan Chronicle – Chennai – 15 November 2016

    In a surprise move, the government last week derecognised the existing Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes, and while policymakers and senior Reserve Bank officials were preparing for this for a long time, it was kept secret from the public to take away any advantage that hoarders of unaccounted money, terrorist financiers, counterfeit operators, money launderers and the like, might have had. The government has vigorously defended this move as a bold step to counter black money and promote digital payments, and is certain of its net positive impact on the economy in the long term. At the same time, critics of the move have denounced it, pointing out that black money is not a stock problem, as most of it does not actually remain stashed in cash, but is likely to be invested through front companies, in benami real estate, gold, and is thus unlikely to be recovered to any significant extent through the ongoing exercise.

    This discussion on the long-term economic impact has overtaken the narrative, with the challenges being faced by honest taxpayers and law-abiding consumers to obtain the new currency notes getting pushed to the background and appearing to be nobody’s business. Such concerns are being summarily brushed aside as teething problems or a minor inconvenience that consumers are expected to bear in the larger interest of the health of the economy. Such apathy to the difficulties faced by the common man is not new and appears to be an inherent feature of government policy decisions that often look at the larger long-term picture, but ignore the short and medium-term impact on different sections of society. This points to a larger systemic malaise of inadequate planning and preparation to deal with implementation-linked challenges of policy decisions.

    As a result, despite the government’s claims of banks, post offices and ATMs being flush with new currency notes within days of this decision, the reality is starkly different. Banks have been repeatedly suspending all exchange operations temporarily to manage crowds. Long serpentine queues are visible outside bank branches as well as ATMs, with the latter frequently getting dry of cash in little to no time. Shortage of staff to load ATMs is adding to the misery. Several ATMs are facing technical glitches, being unable to dispense notes of less than Rs 100 or the new Rs 500 and Rs 2,000 notes. Hospitals and medical shops are not accepting the old currency notes and the latter are often shutting down before their usual time, resulting in lack of proper medical care. Low-income consumers without any valid identify proofs and bank accounts are the worst hit, and are often left with no avenues of currency exchange. Those who are fortunate enough to have the new `2,000 notes are facing difficulties in using them due to the lack of adequate legal change in the market.

    A lack of focus on transition and implementation-related challenges is not unique to the ongoing demonetisation exercise, but has been a common feature of all major reform measures in the past. Many residents of Delhi will remember the long queues for compressed natural gas after the mandatory shift of public vehicles from polluting diesel to CNG, and with insufficient outlets available to dispense the new fuel. Another example is that of the Goods and Services Tax. While a consensus appears on the long-term positive impact of GST on the economy, the limited focus on sensitisation of consumers and SMEs, and on building capacity to address implementation-related chal-lenges could do unintended harm. Similarly, while all agree that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is expected to facilitate exit and unlock capital, lack of engagement with the public on issues like debt mediation, addressing infrastructure and capacity constraints at debt recovery tribunals could pose difficulties in achieving its objectives.

    On the same lines, while the government claims to have taken several measures to facilitate the ease of doing business and access to credit for small and medium enter-prises, in spite of our suggestions no structured mechanism to take stakeholder feedback and measure performance of entry and middle-level government officials could result in sub-optimal outcomes. Going back to the demonetisation scheme, the only places chosen for currency exchange are RBI offices, bank branches and post offices. While the first two do not have enough touch points in rural India, it seems that adequate cash is yet to reach the post offices. Recognised non-bank players (some of whom have obtained payment banks and small banks licences) have offered to operate as currency exchange, deposit and withdrawal points after necessary KYC checks. It seems that the government has not yet warmed up to this idea. As a result, the poor are being forced to get the currency exchanged from moneylenders and hoarders at a loss on account of the commission that is being charged.

    It is essential for the government to think through all the implementation-related challenges of its policies. It must periodically take stakeholder feedback and conduct mid-course correction to ensure benefits reach the intended beneficiaries. For instance, the government could have planned for dedicated touch points in this case at places like schools and hospitals. There should be no problem in co-opting non-bank financial service providers in this initiative. Further, it should be remembered that if consumers are expected to bear the inconvenience during the transition period, they expect the government to come clean with the impact of this move on the economy. The government must proactively declare the extent of black money and counterfeit currency seized as a result of this initiative and how it plans to curb similar illegal activities in the future.

    > The writers work for CUTS International

Comments are moderated

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: