Don’t confuse Wahhabiat with Kashmiriyat – M.D. Nalapat

Hurriyat leaders Sayeed Ali Shah Geelani, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and Mohammad Yasin Malik

Prof M.D. NalapatIt is inexplicable why leaders of so many political parties seek to pamper with public funds the self-declared agents of GHQ Rawalpindi in the Kashmir valley. … The best course would be to give them a ticket to Pakistan, tearing up their Indian passports at the point of departure. – Prof M.D. Nalapat 

Recently, CNN aired visuals by Clarissa Ward, a correspondent who claimed to be reporting from “Free Syria”, i.e. that part of the country that had been prised loose from Bashar Assad. While she had to wear a black abaya while in “freedom”, in Assad’s “unfree” Syria, Ward would have been unmolested even in denims or short skirt, presumably dresses that are more familiar to her than the dress she was in while interviewing “freedom loving” fighters. Such hypocrisy is equally commonplace among Ward-style foreign correspondents in Kashmir, who ignore the reality of the “azaadi” being sought by a violent minority of the people of Jammu & Kashmir being a licence to enforce Taliban-style laws on the population, including stoning to death and chopping off hands. CNN (or the Washington Post, for that matter) has been consistent from the 1990s in backing the Wahhabis in Kashmir, as they were in the case of Libya, when the likes of Arwa Damon and Hala Gorani traipsed around the country in support of the war unleashed in 2011 by Hillary Clinton and other western leaders. In our pell-mell rush to follow US fashions, most of the media in India has continued the error made by Atal Behari Vajpayee during 1998-2004, that of confusing “Wahhabiat” with Kashmiriyat. What organisations such as the Hurriyat seek to achieve in Kashmir is the total replacement of the gentle, Sufi ethos of the state with the harshness of Wahhabism, something which ought to have been clear from at least the 1990s, but which is apparently yet to be understood even by several policymakers.

Appeasing the backers of Wahhabiat damages the chances of Kashmiriyat making a comeback in the Valley, and hence it is not surprising that every gesture of “reconciliation”—i.e. surrender to the Wahhabis—has been followed by a further descent into chaos. This columnist had from the start warned that the “healing touch” touted by the PDP-BJP alliance should bypass the Wahhabis entirely and Mufti Mohammad Sayeed & Mehbooba Mufticoncentrate on those in Kashmir who still believe in the moderate ethos of that state. Instead, as has been taking place in the state since 1975, it was the Wahhabis who were coddled by Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, and which made the present situation in Kashmir inevitable. According to individuals who are current with the facts, an unambiguous signal was sent from within the state government to the Pakistan lobby that the police would largely look the other way should there be protests. This perception of police inaction was the spark which led to the present flame-up, not the killing of a youthful terrorist, although here as well, the UPA policy of refusing to return the remains ought to have been followed. Those who advised the NDA otherwise need to lose their jobs. Thus far, it does not appear that a single individual from those who have motivated and fuelled so many unwary youths in Kashmir into forfeiting their futures has been held to account. And this in a country where the colonial system of governance ensures that citizens get jailed first while the police question him later, presuming they ever do, that is. In a country where a policy of zero tolerance for black money has been initiated by the Prime Minister, no income-tax officer seems at all curious as to how those loyal to Pakistan and who are resident in Kashmir maintain such opulent lifestyles.

After an initial Wahhabi-appeasing stance, Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti appears to be sensing the error in pursuing a soft approach towards those who ultra-hard working for a Wahhabi future for Kashmir. In Delhi, Lutyens Zone policymakers have for long outsourced their thinking to US-based think-tanks, almost all of whom adopt a Wahhabi-friendly tilt in their recommendations. While the US is indeed important in the external security of India, to listen to advice from Washington on matters relating to internal security would lead to a splintering of India. Any country that has followed the US administration’s prescriptions in such matters has spiralled into hell till reversing course, Egypt being a recent example.

Nawaz Sharif & Pak Army ChiefEven after having the door slammed in their faces, it is inexplicable why leaders of so many political parties seek to pamper with public funds the self-declared agents of GHQ Rawalpindi in the Kashmir valley. Taxpayers need to file a petition in court demanding that those policymakers who spend hundreds of crores of rupees of taxpayer money in providing facilities to wannabe Pakistani citizens in Kashmir should be made to repay the cost of such generosity out of their own wealth and income. When members of the Hurriyat are treated at airports and elsewhere with the deference and the protocol shown to Union ministers, it is no surprise that they have contempt for the Indian state. The best course would be to give them a ticket to Pakistan, tearing up their Indian passports at the point of departure. However, before that, it ought to be a criminal misuse of state funds to spend any public money on their upkeep, travel, security or other needs. Vajpayee was correct that Kashmiriyat needs to be encouraged. He was wrong in assuming that pandering to Wahhabiat would assist the return of Kashmiriyat to the Valley. Only those who accept the need for “ekta” should be shown any “mamata” – Sunday Guardian, 10 September 2016

» Prof Madhav Das Nalapat (M.D. Nalapat) is an Indian academic and columnist. Currently Editorial Director of The Sunday Guardian and ITV Network (India), Vice-Chair of Manipal University’s Advanced Research Group, and Director of the Department of Geopolitics, Manipal University, Karnataka.

Uri Army Base near Srinaga

Uri attack will weaken Pakistan’s narrative against India

With blood on its hands, Pak heads to UN to talk Kashmir

5 Responses

  1. It would have been useful if the author had spoken outright against the carnage against Indian soldiers at Uri.

    Now is not the time to make fine distinctions between different brands of Islam.

    It is time that the India government matched its words with some well thought out, well calibrated action against the terrorists camps in Pakistan.

    It is shocking that after 70 years of this nonsense from Pakistan no Indian government has taken relevant action (with the exception of Kargil).

    • This article was first published September 10th in the Sunday Guardian (as posted on the article), long before the events at Uri happened. It was posted on this site today, when the events at Uri were still unclear. News links and photos concerning the Uri attack were added later at the bottom of the page.

  2. Again even Mr Nalapat thinks that Sufism has a gentle ethos??? !!! Disappointing😦. Probably he did not read the history of many Islamic invasions in India, were the sufis were sent as forerunners to the armies and how they raped and pillaged villages and towns!!! Then the same sufis were used to apply balms to the conquered defeated and devastated. Oh god how long is this myth going to endure!!!

    • Yes, you are right. Many if not most of the original Hindu converts to Islam in the mediaeval period were made by Sufis.

      Sita Ram Goel has recorded this sordid Sufi history in one of his books on Islam in India (don’t remember which one exactly).

      • I also believe that there is no such thing as Pakistani terror. It is Islamic terror plain and simple fomented from Pakistan. This is nothing like say the LTTE terror or terror from any other separatist group. If J&K where to go to Pakistan, there would be a genocide on the scale that happened in Rwanda of the Kashmiri pandits. This is not a war between two nations. This is a war between Islam and the Kafir plain and simple.

Comments are moderated

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: