Evangelical Christianity: Devils in high places – Yogesh Pawar

Iain Buchanan“There is a need to go beyond the purely religious objection to Christian missionising, and examine the global forces which define it, and which are subverting countries like India in a far more comprehensive and profound way than most people realise.” — Iain Buchanan

In his explosive new book The Armies Of God: A Study In Militant Christianity, British-born, Malaysia-based academic Iain Buchanan blows the lid off a subject that most scholars and journalists tend to shy away from: the rise of US The Armies of God: A Study in Militant Christianityevangelism as a force in global affairs.

His book looks at how some of the powerful evangelical outfits operate — often as US government proxies — in countries such as Indonesia, Thailand, and of course, India, and the disastrous effects this has had on the relationship between the Christian West and non-Christian cultures, religious communities and nations. He also unmasks the role played by the seemingly secular ‘success motivation’ industry, and its leadership gurus such as Zig Ziglar and Ken Blanchard, who are not only management experts but also conscious agents of US-style Christian evangelism. Excerpts from an interview:

• What led you to write this book?

• I grew up in an agnostic family with respect for spirituality of all kinds — from animism to true Christianity. I suppose one of my strongest incentives for writing the book was to show how, in the West, inherently decent things like liberal secularism and Christian spirituality (no necessary conflict here!) are so deeply corrupted by political power and so dishonestly vaunted as marks of cultural superiority.

• Not many would want to come out in the open and talk about the issues raised in your book. Was that a concern for you?

• In the West, certainly, there is a reluctance to enquire too deeply into the affairs of organised Christianity — both at home and overseas. Western culture is a deeply, subliminally Christian culture, and even committed secularists have trouble avoiding Christian parameters in their arguments, and recognising the Christian capacity for wrong-doing. Among other things, this leads to a rather benign view of the behaviour of our missionaries overseas — fed partly by ignorance, and partly by a sense that the Christian mission can be equated with civilisation. And such myopia has increased dramatically over the past 40 years, as the secular West has managed to define a global order largely in its own terms, with decisive help from its Christian missionaries. By contrast, of course, the behaviour of non-Christians (especially Muslims) is scrutinised ruthlessly, misunderstood, and demonised.

• Academics who have attempted to study the work of missionaries in India have been accused of helping the right-wing Hindutva brigade. Has this been your experience too?

• The glib response to this would be to say that religious extremism of any kind needs to be exposed. But it is more complex than this. There is a need to go beyond the purely religious objection to Christian missionising, and examine the global forces which define it, and which are subverting countries like India in a far more comprehensive and profound way than most people realise.

A key contention of my book is that the extremism of Christian evangelicals is no more benign than the extremism found in non-Christian religious groups. Indeed, its local impact can be hugely destructive — precisely because of its ability to draw upon a vast global network of forces (including powerful secular ones), and its ability to penetrate and shape local forces, whether they be ethnic, religious, political, or social, according to alien priorities.

• You speak at length of the US’s use of Christianity for it own geopolitical designs. Is this manifestly part of US strategy worldwide?

• Most Western leaders (not just Bush and Blair) will claim they are inspired by their Christian beliefs. Sometimes, as with both Reagan and George W. Bush, they quote chapter and verse in support of policy, although usually it is not so blatant. Certainly, deep in Washington, self-professedly Christian pressure groups (like the Fellowship Foundation and the Council for National Policy) have a highly influential membership and a powerful grip on policy.

Of course, one can debate whether US strategy is manifestly Christian in inspiration — few Americans would say it is not, although most would probably insist that such strategy is guided primarily by secular concerns.

But there is no doubt at all that US strategy makes deliberate (and somewhat cynical) use of Christian agencies in pursuit of foreign policy — and that the distinction between the religious and the secular is deliberately blurred in the process. There are over 600 US-based evangelical groups, some as big as large corporations, and between them they constitute a vast and highly organised network of global influence, purposefully targeting non-Christians, and connecting and subverting every sector of life in the process.

Most of the major evangelical corporations (like World Vision, Campus Crusade, Youth with a Mission, and Samaritan’s Purse) operate in partnership with the US government in its pursuit of foreign policy goals. World Vision, which is effectively an arm of the State Department, is perhaps the most notable example of this. There is also the benefit of a custom-built legislation, with the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 providing necessary sanction to bring errant nations into line.

This means that evangelisation is an intensely secular pursuit, as well as a religious one. In turn, of course, the secular powers, whether they be departments of state or corporate businesses, find such evangelicals to be very effective partners.

Indeed, most missionaries are not obviously religious. A case in point is the Success Motivation industry.Many of the most popular ‘leadership gurus’ — Zig Ziglar, Paul Meyer, Os Hillman, Richard DeVos, John C. Maxwell, and Ken Blanchard, for example — are not just management experts, they are also evangelical Christians and conscious agents of US-style evangelisation. Conversely, groups which, on the face of it, are primarily religious, may also serve a powerful secular agenda, such as the collection of intelligence, the grooming of political or commercial elites, or the manipulation of local conflicts.

• Some accuse the church of fomenting dissent among poor tribals by exploiting them; others say the church is a liberating force. This debate has gone on for decades in India’s North-East. What is your view?

• The situation of India’s tribal people, like that of tribal people elsewhere in Asia, is certainly tragic. And it may be that Christian activity offers an opportunity to escape the various forms of homegrown oppression — state and corporate abuse, Hindu contempt, and so on. But Christianity in India is a very diverse thing. There are many situations where the Christian church has taken firm root, and is deeply involved in local administration, social welfare, education, and so on. Nagaland is a case in point. There are movements for tribal welfare elsewhere which are Christian-inspired and doing excellent work.

But there are many cases, too, of evangelical missions which go into tribal areas with little respect for local realities, and with an agenda far removed from tribal welfare. In this, they may be no better and no worse than the home-grown oppressor. But there is an important difference. Such missionaries often belong to an evangelical network whose strategic purpose is defined elsewhere, and which has little loyalty to the local population, its cultures, its communities, and its welfare, let alone to the nation as a whole. This is particularly true of the new breed of US-inspired evangelicals, led by Baptists and Pentecostalist/Charismatics, who have spearheaded evangelisation over the past 50 years. It is the working of this wider, and self-consciously global, structure of behaviour which is of concern.

It is unfortunate that missions doing good work in tribal areas have their efforts tarnished by others whose approach is more opportunistic and exploitative. For the new evangelicals, distaste for paganism is just part of the equation — oppressed tribal groups are a relatively easy target to penetrate in a much wider war against non-Christians generally, and for influence in strategic (especially border) areas. In this respect, even a relatively long-established Christian presence — as in Nagaland — has utility as a strategic outpost.

• These are turbulent times for India as its number of hungry and poor are growing exponentially even as the wealthy in the cities are becoming billionaires. Does this make harvesting of souls easy? Do missionaries love turbulence?

• It certainly seems, sometimes, that evangelicals thrive on suffering and disaster. India’s own K.P. Yohannan, for example, welcomed the tsunami of 2004 as “one of the greatest opportunities God has given us to share His love with people” — and he was only one of many expressing such sentiments. There is no question that many evangelicals exploit the poor and marginalised for reasons which have a lot to do with narrow theology and political self-interest, and relatively little to do with long-term practical help.

But evangelicals court the wealthy and the powerful of a society with equal passion. One of the most telling features of the new evangelism is the way it has turned Christianity into a force for protecting the rich and powerful. US Protestantism, in particular, has worked hard to undermine the impulse in the church towards social justice and reform. A measure of its success has been the defeat of Liberation Theology and the remarkable expansion of US Pentecostalism in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. More than a quarter of all Christians now belong to Pentecostalist and Charismatic churches.

In these, as in most new evangelical churches, great attention is paid to a ‘theology’ of economics which stresses individual profit, corporate obedience, the sanctity of making money, and the power of “miracles, signs, and wonders.” This ‘theology’ is a key part of modern imperialism: it offers something to both rich and poor, it is safely counter-revolutionary, and it ties tightly into the wider global network of more secular influences (in business, government, education, the media, the military) which underpins Western expansion.

So the evangelical church has a key role to play in a society as disparate as India’s. It is a form of social management: it gives divine sanction to the rich, it gives hope to the struggling middle class, and it cultivates discipline (and distraction) amongst the poor — and it does all this with a keen eye to the West’s self-interest. This is not to suggest that India does not have its own mechanisms for doing the same things. But such evangelisation, as a concomitant of Westernisation, is bound to strengthen as India urbanises and looks ever more Westwards.

• A recent issue of the Texas-based magazine, Gospel For Asia, says: “The Indian sub-continent with one billion people, is a living example of what happens when Satan rules the entire culture…. India is one vast purgatory in which millions of people …. are literally living a cosmic lie! Could Satan have devised a more perfect system for causing misery?” How and why does such propaganda work in a developed country like the US in the era of the Internet and the media?

• There are two important points here. First, we must not assume that the ‘developed’ West is free from wilful ignorance. Indeed, wilful ignorance is often a very useful weapon. We need enemies, and, as religious people, we need demons. The utility of Islamophobia is a case in point. Besides, there’s a useful role for such bigotry within the system: as a foil for the liberal powerful to prove their liberal credentials.

But such attitudes are nothing new, of course. Christians have waged such ‘spiritual warfare’ against their enemies for centuries, and with the same kind of language. What is new is the vastly increased facility, offered by the electronic media, for fighting such a war. And this is the second point.

New technology is spreading, and hardening, such bigotry. Since the mid-1960s, the evangelical movement has systematically computerised its entire global operation, creating huge databases of information on its non-Christian enemies, centralising administration, and linking some 500 million ‘Christian computers’ worldwide for the purposes of fighting ‘spiritual warfare’ against non-believers in strategic places. And ‘spiritual warfare’, for the evangelical Christian movement, is not just a matter of prayers and metaphor: it is also, very decisively, a matter of ‘virtuous’ troops, tanks, and drones.  –DNA, Mumbai, March 27, 2011


11 Responses

  1. Where can I buy this book?

  2. I interned at World Vision in Washington DC for a short time, so I wanted to correct your picture… The actual World Vision building in DC looks like this (http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&prmd=ivnsm&biw=1344&bih=790&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=world+vision+washington+dc&fb=1&gl=us&hq=world+vision&hnear=0x89b7c6de5af6e45b:0xc2524522d4885d2a,Washington+D.C.,+DC&ei=cOgITtiuDJSRgQfQwOXoDQ&sa=X&oi=local_group&ct=image&ved=0CAQQtgM&iwloc=cids:10874535429773154270) – it is on 300 I Street, and it is not the headquarters but a satellite office. Your picture is of the headquarters in Federal Way, Washington (State).

    While I never saw World Vision’s work firsthand on the ground, from what I saw in the office there, it was a very multicultural and diverse organization. I do think that preserving the local culture and not exporting US culture or presenting it as superior was a concern there (and that was also a point brought up frequently by the many staff members who were not from the US). I think you’re right that there is a danger in Christians seeking to co-opt others’ home cultures, and in going along with governmental agendas too much in exchange for matching grants, etc., and it is important that people are aware of that.

    As a Christian who donates to World Vision and other relief organizations (not exclusively Christian ones), my primary intention is not to carry out the US’ agenda or even necessarily to get others to convert. My hope is that that money will go towards alleviating suffering from disasters, helping people build their own local businesses from microloans, building infrastructure like clean water, and giving children opportunities to go to school. I want to do these sorts of things to show love to others, and also in part as repentance for the way in which the US has bullied and exploited other nations for its own gain.

    Even though I cannot understand the depth of what you are feeling and experiencing, as a Christian and as someone who was briefly affiliated with World Vision, I would like to apologize for any harm that Christians/World Vision has done to you, for promoting Western culture as superior, for fueling local conflicts, and for exploiting people’s suffering for their own gain. Those things are not right, and I’m sorry that they happened.

    • Your link gives a map reference not a photo. The photo on the article is sourced from Wikipedia and identified as World Vision US Headquarters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Vision_US_Headquarters.jpg

      The problem is not the promotion of western culture but the promotion of Christian doctrine and conversion of innocent villagers in return for some medical and educational benefits. World Vision is a missionary organisation that operates under cover of doing social work. It is the largest Christian NGO operating in India and works closely with the US government in intelligence gathering. Is does immense damage to the social fabric in the villages by promoting an alien religious ideology and breaking up families by converting individual family members, usually innocent children that have been indoctrinated in forced Bible classes. When whole families are converted they become alienated from the village and culture of their ancestors.

      World Vision has also involved itself in politics and allegedly assassinated those Hindu leaders who have resisted their conversion agenda. See https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/world-vision-christian-ngo-engaged-in-culture-murder-not-social-service-v-k-shashikumar/. See also Mahatma Gandhi on Christian missionaries operating in India at https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/130/.

      Christians may believe what they like but they have no right, divine or otherwise, to meddle with the culture and religious traditions of the people they impose themselves on. It is a gross violation of freedom of religion and basic human rights.

      Christianity teaches that the greatest sin is to undermine and destroy the faith of other people. But that is exactly what Christian missionaries are doing in India!

  3. This is the video of Iain Buchanan’s lecture. Please see and hear the lecture . A long one.

  4. […] spirituality (no necessary conflict here!) are so deeply corrupted by political … Read More- christian political sites – Google Blog Search Lion of Judah Movie- Sponsor: Lionofjudahthemovie.com- Lion of Judah the Movie- Check out "The […]

  5. Iain Buchanan has scholarly put across something which smaller morals like me have known long ago. It does not take a genuis to know what the Evangelical corporates are engaged in India. Christian culture is civilzation and hence conversion work calls for total change of the person-his/her culture and with it the values. This is what alienation is all about. I wish our politicians like P.C Chidambaram, Kapil Sibal, Mani Shankar Aiyer and the other big mouthed politcians read this book. Even if they read will they pause to reflect. From unawareness to wareness will our PM get enlighted? Above all does it not also show case the motive of Mrs Sonia Gandhi? One must focus on the evangelical corporate like the World Vision which the author rightly points out is the effective arm of the State Department of the USA. If this revelation does not trouble and bother our politicians then what will?Today India is beset with conquerors in the garb of evengelical corporates. The author has succintly mentioned a few like the World Vision which is the lead, then Campus Crusade,Youth with a Mission and the Samaritan’s Purse. All these are but extensions of the USA’s governmental channels. If our politicians are not aware then they need to be thrown into the Indian ocean.The danger lies in the fact that they are aware but dare not act. So they are no better than traitors. This is why Kandhamal riots had a special significance. The rape of a nun found echoes in the European Union and like a school boy Manmohan Singh was reprimanded and he stood up shaking with his jerky knees and apologised, instead of telling them to mind their own business and not poke into India’s internal affairs. What a shame to have such men with clay feet at the helm of affairs. Patriotism is something which our politicians are compeletely devoid of. I challenge those in power to ban all funds flowing from foreign countries into the above mentioned Evangelical corporates and watch the sea change.

    • Dr. Raja, I have been warning about these marauders and culture-killers for 25 years. Everybody listens but nobody can do anything about it. It has to be dealt with by state and central governments, not individuals. Corrupt as she was, Indira Gandhi would have thrown these Protestant Evangelical Christian missionaries out of the country. But times have changed and so has the nature of the political leaders and their governments.

      • I agree with you. Indira Gandhi’s patriotism could not be doubted. I had written to her a letter regarding the fund flow into the Christian NGOs. Then Venkataraman was the Finance Minister. She replied to me and directed my letter to him. Today we have pygmies in power and they have no patriotism. Sonia has her hidden agenda. What is happening in India suits her. Manmohan Singh has neither the guts nor the vision to handle these. I really feel depressed. Christians and Muslims have the first claim right to the resources of this country was something openly and unabashedly stated by the PM. A secular country we call ourselves but we have Haj subsidy, a budget for the minoirites (read Muslims), a ministry to look after the affairs of the minorities, and now in Kerala a bank exclusively for the Muslims. Not even Islamic countries have such. The European countries want first to destroy the Hindus, then they think they can tackle the Muslims. This will not be possible.

Comments are moderated

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: