“This is a good time for us to know some hard truths. When we speak on behalf of the Tamils against the LTTE and find fault with the TNA for serving as LTTE mouthpiece, we would like to know whether we are wrong to find fault. When we find fault with the LTTE for threatening Tamils and denying them progress for several decades, are we wrong to do so? We would frankly like to know whether our opinion of the LTTE and the TNA is the same as the Tamils’ or whether we are wrong to assume that the LTTE was a terrorist outfit and the TNA nothing but its mouthpiece and now taking over from where LTTE failed?” – Shenali Waduge
Given that separation of Sri Lanka is out of the question, the Tamils had two choices before them. To be ruled under a de facto armed LTTE, or to remain under sovereign Sri Lanka ruled by a democratically elected Government that comprised representatives of all ethnic groups.
The Tamils did live under the LTTE for well over 25 years and the Tamil political party, the Tamil National Alliance, openly declared that the LTTE was the “sole representative of the Tamils”, not once but several times. In so doing, the TNA lumped all the Tamils en masse into a terrorist group and stigmatized their own people. How irresponsible for a political party to equate Tamils with terrorism.
The Tamils now need to undo this damage by disassociating themselves from the TNA which continues a separatist agenda if Tamils do not share the separatist agenda of both LTTE and TNA. It is long overdue for the Tamils to now come out and say whether life was better under the LTTE, whether TNA was correct to say LTTE stood for all Tamils, and how life is today different.
Why is separation of Sri Lanka to form a Tamil Eelam out of the question?
It is so because when 72 million out of the world’s 77 million Tamils live in a state which has a history of attempting to secede from India on the grounds that it wishes to form a Tamil Nation and that state is named after Tamils (Tamil Nadu – land of the Tamils), where Tamil is the official language, where Tamil culture, traditions etc reign supreme – by virtue of everything being done by Tamils, for Tamils, Tamil Nadu is where Tamil Eelam should rightfully be, and not in a miniscule area in Sri Lanka where none of the world’s 77 million could ever think of congregating.
The whole Eelam-in-Sri Lanka quest was nothing but a ploy to spur the balkanizing of Tamil Nadu from India, which India schemed to perfection. The only confusion came when external forces hijacked that plan to create a grander plan which ultimately led to the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. His death carried out by LTTE bore signs of a contract killing. India may well do to find out who exactly ordered the killing. The “new” state is likely to comprise Tamil Nadu and north Sri Lanka which will end up nothing better than the brothel state Philippines has been reduced to. It is a challenge for the Church to prove that the assumption that they supported the LTTE is wrong, instead of simply calling those that pose the questions as racists, hate mongers and what not simply to avoid answering questions.
Who actually suffered under LTTE rule?
It is time we know who amongst the Tamils actually suffered:
1. Tamils living amongst the LTTE in the Vanni (Mullaitivu, Kilinochchi)
2. Tamils living outside of LTTE “territory” in Sri Lanka
3. Tamils living outside of LTTE “territory” overseas
The number of Tamils living in the Vanni amongst the LTTE through three decades of LTTE rule is miniscule compared to the Tamils who live outside of LTTE “territory” amongst Sinhalese and those now living overseas.
It is from this miniscule number that LTTE made their manpower. Some of its cadres were taken from impoverished areas of the East too. What essentially has to be remembered is that the Tamil members that LTTE “recruited” were kidnapped and forcibly taken from impoverished Hindus whose women had to supply LTTE throughout the conflict. Did LTTE kidnap its cadres from rich high-caste Tamil homes in Jaffna or Colombo – NO. This is an area that has not been looked into, but is extremely important in order to derive at the manner in which LTTE selected its cadres. If there were high-castes in the LTTE, they all held senior posts and were privy to the LTTE kitty which was US $300 million.
Areas of Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi never even had electricity; children never went to school and the people had lived thinking that life was all about LTTE. Today, over 60% of these areas already enjoy electricity, schools are functioning, teachers can teach and there are students to teach.
It is these miniscule number of Tamils suffering under the LTTE that now sees a brand new life where none of the rest of the Tamils cared to speak on their behalf – ever. Did the TNA ever ask the LTTE not to kidnap these children to manufacture them into killers, training them in pretentious orphanages set up in the middle of the jungles visited by Father Emmanuel, raising questions as to why the Church would watch one of its leaders encourage children to be turned into killers?
Deriving at exact numbers is cumbersome in view of no proper census taking place in the areas that LTTE controlled for over two decades. It must also be pointed out that LTTE, humanitarian organizations having close links to LTTE, including religious groups, gave false figures of civilian populations in view of the Government of Sri Lanka sending food and essential supplies to the north, which was a crafty means of hijacking these essentials to be used by the LTTE.
Figures are confused in the likelihood of “illegals” coming from Tamil Nadu and now posing as Sri Lankan Tamils. These “illegals” need to first be identified. Then there is the visible numbers of Tamils making their way southwards to live amongst the Sinhalese whilst others made use of the opportunity to cry discrimination and see asylum overseas. Therefore, with Tamils comprising 12% of the population of a 20 million total populace – Tamils can at most be 2.4 million only.
The estate Tamils numbering 5% are never part of any discussions proposed by TNA or the LTTE, therefore they should not be included into the statistical figure simply to make Tamil representation 18%. As things stand with Tamils now living legally and illegally overseas, the 12% has come down to about 10% if not less. The Sri Lankan foreign missions should be asked to do a statistical analysis of the legal numbers of Tamils living overseas, whilst help should be sought from host nations to find out the illegal ballpark figure too.
Therefore, what needs to be clearly stated is that the Tamils living amongst the LTTE were the real sufferers. All the other Tamils shared the same fears that the Sinhalese faced since it was Sinhalese civilians who became the targets with every bomb and suicide attack. Yet, the Tamils living in Colombo and the suburbs went about their employment and did everything they would normally do alongside the rest of the communities, but obviously sharing the same fears. There was nothing exclusive that they feared different to what the other communities feared.
Tamils overseas, however, whether openly pro-LTTE or not, had to make monthly payments to the LTTE kitty and had to participate in demonstrations and other events that LTTE front organizations organized. With time, this arrangement bore much monetary benefit, giving many positions in these front organizations, opportunities to travel overseas, rise in financial situation and moreover, a chance to move around with VIPs and dictate terms to even Sri Lankan politicians. For most Tamils, whether they like to admit or not, there were some reasons to thank the LTTE, while a handful of others were open enough to admit to LTTE atrocities but at great risk to their lives. The handful of moderates who openly denounced the LTTE was silenced and understandably that warned others into silence.
But this is a good time for us to know some hard truths. When we speak on behalf of the Tamils against the LTTE and find fault with the TNA for serving as LTTE mouthpiece, we would like to know whether we are wrong to find fault. When we find fault with the LTTE for threatening Tamils and denying them progress for several decades, are we wrong to do so? We would frankly like to know whether our opinion of the LTTE and the TNA is the same as the Tamils’ or whether we are wrong to assume that the LTTE was a terrorist outfit and the TNA nothing but its mouthpiece and now taking over from where LTTE failed?
Somehow somewhere something is not right. After the victory over the LTTE, we as citizens of Sri Lanka expected the Tamil community to join us in the victory over terrorism, and given the fact that the LTTE had been denying Tamils a host of human rights and violating Tamil human rights, we thought the Tamils living amongst the Sinhalese and those overseas would be happy that LTTE was no more and would press for action against the TNA since they were the only survivors of the separatism linked to LTTE. We would like to know why our assumptions have been proved wrong by the Tamils themselves.
Genuine reconciliation cannot take place until these loopholes and gaps are given genuine and honest answers. – Vijayvaani, 25 April 2013
» The author is a keen observer of contemporary affairs and a Sri Lanka national.
The Christian Church is the root cause of Tamil separatism in Sri Lanka.
Filed under: british india, catholic bishops council of india, christian, christian terrorism, civil rights, conversion, cultural relativism, democracy, dravidian, ethnic cleansing, geopolitics, globalization, india, indian politics, nation state, nationalism, psychological warfare, religion, secularism, tamil nadu, tamils, terrorism, vatican | Tagged: AIADMK, christian terrorism, church support for LTTE, civil war, DMK, government of tamil nadu, human rights, indian politics, LTTE, politics, religion, sri lanka, sri lankan tamils, tamil eelam, tamil nadu, tamil national alliance, tamil tigers, TNA, world hegemony | Leave a Comment »